William Symington (Part 3): The Glasgow Years

The final part of Stephen’s series on former Stranraer minister William Symington is in the most recent issue of Good News. You can read it below:

unnamed (1).jpg

Few people in the history of the Reformed Presbyterian Church have ever preached regularly to thousands, but William Symington was one of them. In a 23-year ministry in Glasgow, from 1839 until his death in 1862, he preached weekly in a building that held 1000 people. His evening services in the Great Hamilton Street congregation proved so popular that he began a third service in the afternoon. About a year after moving to Glasgow, he wrote in his journal: ‘The crowd at evening lecture most overwhelming; many hurt in getting in: hundreds not able to find admission: house filled in five minutes after door opened’.

Symington’s decision to move to Glasgow had not been an easy one. After seventeen years in Stranraer, he had received a call to another Glasgow congregation (West Campbell Street), having previously turned down a call to Dumfries in 1829. His journal shows how he wrestled with the Glasgow call, but in the end the Synod refused to sustain it. At that time, the idea of a minister moving from one congregation to another was almost unheard of. The same congregation called him again the following year, but that time he refused it himself. However, in 1839 the Great Hamilton Street congregation called him, Synod eventually sustained it, and he went.

A snapshot of what a typical service would have looked like is recorded in a contemporary book entitled Our Scottish Clergy. On the day in question in 1847, Symington’s service consisted of the singing of four verses of a psalm, a prayer and the reading of part of another psalm, followed by a twenty-minute psalm exposition. Another short passage was read before a 55 minute ‘lecture’, and the service was concluded with prayer, singing and the benediction.

After a short break, there was an afternoon service, which consisted of singing, ‘a prayer of much fervour and very great length’, a reading and a sermon. The reviewer noted that ‘the only thing remarkable in the public services of the Reformed Presbyterian Church is their exclusive use of the psalms – paraphrases and hymns being both prohibited’.

Although the congregation was large, a sense of fellowship was kindled through society or fellowship meetings. These weekly small-group meetings had been part of the fabric of the Reformed Presbyterian Church from the very beginning. Detailed rules for how such meetings were to be conducted had been published by the denomination in 1782 and 1823. The Great Hamilton Street congregation had twenty-four such groups meeting regularly, at which, as one of Symington’s elders explained, ‘a text or subject previously appointed was then discussed by all present’. Symington’s journal records his careful weekly visitation of these meetings and in later years he assigned ‘Fellowship Meetings’ as a subject for research and report by his students at the Theological Hall. During Symington’s time an objection was raised against an elder-elect who did not consider these meetings ‘necessary in the present age’ – he was not ordained!

When Symington moved to Glasgow, the membership of the congregation was little over 300 – and decreasing. However, at his first communion season in Glasgow, 65 names were added to the membership roll. Entries were made twice each year, at the October and April communion seasons, and the number of new members each time seldom fell below 40 in all the years he was there. By 1853 he calculated that there had been over 1500 admissions to membership during the sixteen years he had been there. With the total membership now at 993, a daughter congregation was formed, as the church building was no longer large enough to hold even the members and their families. Later that same year we find Symington asking for the help of an assistant, because despite all the deductions caused by immigration, the planting of a new congregation and death, there were still more than 900 people on the roll.

Nor was this a loose membership. Symington divided the entire number into geographical areas. An elder was assigned to each of these areas and given the responsibility of calling on the members in it. The record of these visitations was reviewed twice a year. There were decreases in membership during the pastorates that followed and preceded Symington’s, but while he was minister three new congregations were formed and by the time of his death the membership of the mother congregation was treble what it had been when he arrived. Roy Blackwood comments that ‘few if any other congregations in the denomination could have mustered even 500 members during these years’. On Symington’s death, the Synod noted ‘we have reason to believe that not only did the congregation grow in numbers but that many were by his instrumentality brought to the knowledge of the truth and savingly converted’.

Symington particularly invested in the young men in his congregation. Thirty men who were either members of, or connected with, the congregation became ministers, including two professors of theology and three missionaries.

One of those who became a professor in the RP Church and later the Free Church was William Binnie. After Symington’s death he recalled ‘I can never forget a parting visit I paid him in his study one day in the autumn of 1845. I was going off to spend a winter on the continent. He made me kneel along with him, and commended me to God in a prayer which affected me far more than any public prayer of his had ever done: it was so simple, so warm, so clearly an outpouring of the heart’.

One of those who became a missionary was the famous John G. Paton. Paton had been an elder and city missionary in Great Hamilton Street and then in Green Street, where a church, manse and school were purchased. When Paton felt the call of God to go and serve as one of the RP Missionaries in the New Hebrides, he was famously warned by an elderly gentleman ‘you will be eaten by cannibals’. Paton writes ‘even Dr Symington…repeatedly urged me to remain at home’. His ‘beloved minister’s’ reasons seem to have been the success Paton was seeing at home, and also the threat the cannibals posed to his life.

It would be wrong, however, to conclude that Symington was unmoved by the claims of mission. From the beginning of his ministry he had supported the claims of Jewish mission, and when in Stranraer had hosted a meeting to support Thomas Chalmers’s scheme of Church Extension in the Church of Scotland.

During his time in Stranraer, he heard Alexander Duff speak of the National Church’s plan for Christianising India. He wrote in his journal: ‘I reckon it a great privilege to have heard and met with this great and good man. May it be blessed for increasing my zeal for the conversion of the heathen’. Less than three months later, on Old New Year’s Day, 1838, he gathered together the youth of the congregation, read some missionary intelligence and delivered an address on the obligation of Christians to diffuse the gospel among the heathen. A juvenile missionary society was formed, and he prayed ‘May this be the commencement of a mission to the heathen from the Reformed Presbyterian Church in Scotland’. Years later, in Glasgow, he wrote in his journal that he had met David Livingston and his wife and ‘had a long conversation with the great African traveller’. 

Symington’s friendships with men in the evangelical wing of the Church of Scotland testify to the fact that he was far from narrow in his outlook. The nineteenth century was a time of great religious and philanthropic societies (Bible societies, widow and orphan societies etc), and Symington was involved in many of them from the beginning, alongside evangelicals from other denominations.

He preached in many churches outside his own denomination. Shortly after the formation of the Free Church he was asked to preach the opening sermon at an interdenominational conference to mark the bicentenary of the Westminster Assembly, where the key documents of British and American Presbyterianism had been drawn up. That sermon, entitled ‘Love one another’, included a call for unity, which helped lead to the first meeting of the World Evangelical Alliance, two years later. Through Symington’s influence, the Credal Basis of the Alliance included a reference to the Mediatorial Kingship of Christ. Explaining the remarkable interest of the Reformed Presbyterians in the Evangelical Alliance, the denominational magazine said ‘we know none that are under greater obligations to hail and further the cause of union than the followers of the Scottish Reformers, and the professed friends of the Solemn League and Covenant’.

Symington was called home at the age of 66 on 28th January 1862. His final journal entry, written two weeks before, reads: ‘Still weak as ever’. James M’Gill, who had turned his horse around 30 years before after Robert’s death, took his memorial service. He preached on Hebrews 11v4: ‘He being dead, yet speaketh’. Over 150 years later, through his writings which have been republished in our own century, people around the world are still hearing William Symington speak today.

Irn Bru saga reminds us new isn't always improved

irn bru old unimproved.jpg

Irn Bru fans across Scotland were recently cheered by the announcement from makers Barr that they will be producing a limited edition of the drink based on the 1901 recipe. Scotland’s national soft drink was the biggest casualty of the 2018 sugar tax, when the sugar content in a can was reduced from 38% to a paltry 17%. While other companies like Coca Cola stuck to their guns rather than water down their product, Barr reduced the sugar rather than face a price rise. I still have a stash of the unadulterated product kept for special occasions – now past its best before date, but still infinitely better than the neutered version. My reaction to the new ‘ginger’ is shared by many, with around 4,000 people having signed up to a Facebook event to storm Barr’s headquarters earlier this month in an effort to try and find the full-fat product.

In light of all this, when an advertisement recently appeared for a limited edition of the 1901 recipe with the caption ‘Old and unimproved’, you can imagine the joy across the nation. It will be released on 2nd December and cost £2 for a 750ml glass bottle. The saga is a reminder that sometimes a new thing is not an improvement. There are times when the words ‘old and unimproved’ sound magical. Don’t even get me started on the 2015 change to Crème Eggs, where Cadbury’s Dairy Milk chocolate was replaced by standard cocoa mix!

irn bru through the ages.jpg

New doesn’t always mean improved – and I would make the case that the same applies to theology. Should churches change with the times? Well I’m certainly glad that the old stoves and gas heaters in our church building have been replaced by gas central heating. One of the first decisions that was taken when I arrived four years ago was to replace the version of the Bible which was read from in church. The old translation was dearly loved by many who had been brought up on it, but living languages change over time. The apostles themselves wrote the New Testament in Koine (‘common’) Greek rather than the more literary classical Greek of previous centuries.

irn-bru.jpg

Those things are just externals, however. What about the actual content of the faith? Our church, like many others around the world, holds to a Confession of Faith (summary of what we believe the Bible teaches), which dates back to 1646. To many, the idea that something from back then could be fit for purpose in 2019 would be laughable. But if neither God or human nature changes, then to replace it with something new wouldn’t necessarily be an improvement. Obviously, any human document is fallible. But if we were to change it, the impetus would need to come from new insights into God’s word, rather than simply crumbling in the face of outside pressure and slavishly following the culture.

barrs factory cumbernauld.jpg

Churches tend to change what they believe for pragmatic reasons – for example, to try and keep young people interested. Yet one of the common complaints in mainline churches today is that there are no young people! Could it be that the two things are connected? If young people aren’t hearing anything different in church than they can hear in the media, they will see no reason to go. Jesus said that the church was to be ‘salt’ and ‘light’ in the world – and it can only be those things if it stands out as different. Even if we were to approach the question from a purely pragmatic perspective, surveys show that it is actually theologically conservative churches which are growing and have more young people attending. The Guardian recently quoted the lead researcher of one such survey as saying: ‘If you’re in a mainline church and it’s dying, chances are it’s theological position is what’s killing it’. Almost 80 years ago, C. S. Lewis argued that God has given human beings the love of both change and permanence, but warned against trying to twist the natural pleasantness of change into a demand for absolute novelty.

Certainly there is a need to present the Bible’s teaching in language that everyone can understand, and apply timeless truth to contemporary situations. Churches which do things simply because they’ve always been done that way won’t survive for long. But at the same time we need to be aware that ‘the story of church history is the story of orthodoxy contending with novelty’. In a world where people are searching for certainty, ‘old and unimproved’ isn’t such a bad slogan.

Published in the Stranraer and Wigtownshire Free Press, 28th November 2019


 

Kanye West: a modern-day Covenanter?

It’s not every day that Times Square in New York is lit up with huge advertisements proclaiming ‘Jesus is King’. It has been recently however following the release of the new album with that title by Kanye West. If you’re not familiar with him, the 42-year-old is one of the best-selling music artists of all time. He’s also well-known for his marriage to reality TV star Kim Kardashian. What he’s not known for are album titles that sound like the sort of thing the Covenanters of South-West Scotland once emblazoned on their banners.

Kanye has moved from ‘I am a God’ to ‘Jesus is King’

Kanye has moved from ‘I am a God’ to ‘Jesus is King’

In 2006, Kanye was accused of blasphemy after he appeared on the front cover of Rolling Stone wearing a crown of thorns, with the headline ‘The Passion of Kanye West’. His 2013 album ‘Yeezus’ played on the name Jesus and included a track entitled ‘I am a God’. Now his life appears to be heading in a completely different direction. According to his wife, he’s been ‘born again and saved by Christ’. His concerts have become weekly ‘Sunday services’, featuring a short sermon delivered by a previously unknown Reformed pastor, Adam Tyson.

West has been very open about his newfound faith in a number of interviews, including one with James Corden, which is currently trending on YouTube with 11 million views in less than a week. Kanye tells Corden that the new night-time routine in the West household is Kim watching Dateline (an American news show) and him reading the Bible. Corden responds: ‘Seriously?’. Corden also speaks for many who will be sceptical about the change, asking ‘What do you say to people who will say I don’t believe it?’ ‘That you would one day be living your life in a certain way and now saying that everything is for [God]?’ Kanye responds by describing it as the difference between being asleep and awake.

Yet although he has experienced a radical transformation, it also seems to be something Kanye has long been searching for, even if he didn’t realise it. In his 2004 single ‘Jesus walks’ he prays ‘God show me the way because the Devil’s tryna break me down’. He says ‘I wanna talk to God but I’m afraid ‘cause we ain’t spoke in so long’. Now, looking back, he says ‘I didn’t know what it was to be saved’, adding ‘people want something but there isn’t anyone telling them how to do it’.

Unsurprisingly, Kanye’s transformation has met with mixed reactions – and not just from those who don’t share his new mission to ‘turn atheists into believers’. Many, both Christians and non-Christians, wonder whether it’s all just a stunt. Others wonder whether it will last. He wouldn’t be the first artist to go through a temporary ‘born again’ period – many will remember Bob Dylan’s 3-year Christian phase when he too began to preach at concerts. Kanye anticipates such reservations, singing on the new album that Christians will be ‘the first ones to judge me’. ‘To sing of change, you think I’m joking / to praise His name, you ask what I’m smoking’.

While only time will tell if his conversion is the real deal, there are reasons to be optimistic. Kanye seems different from the many celebrities who merely pay lip-service to God. He seems to have a clear understanding of what conversion, saying ‘the road to hell is paved with “Oh, I’m just a good person”’. In an interview with former Radio 1 DJ Zane Lowe he says that whether people will get into heaven or not depends on whether they have accepted Jesus. He has spoken a number of times about the need for ‘radical obedience’. Kanye is also remarkably clear-sighted about his previous life, saying: ‘I thought I was the God of culture, but culture was my God’. ‘I worshipped the idea of labels, brand names, I worshipped cars’. Now he says ‘nothing beats God’. Nor does he present himself as the finished article; he talks candidly with Lowe about his ongoing struggles with pornography addiction, even as a Christian. In Tyson, Kanye also has the counsel of a solid pastor.

Whatever way it all pans out, it’s certainly refreshing to see the phrase ‘Jesus is King’ trending on social media, and to hear a celebrity like Kanye talking about the change God has brought about in his life. Long-term fans may be disappointed. Many reviewers have slated the new album, with Time Magazine complaining it’s ‘weighed down by its lack of demons’. But for those tired of battling their demons that might sound like no bad thing.

Published in the Stranraer & Wigtownshire Free Press, 14th November 2019

Job loss can't take away your dignity or valu

Border Cars lies empty

Border Cars lies empty

It has been a horrendous couple of months for job losses in Stranraer. Over thirty jobs were lost when Border Cars went into administration in July and the following month Brambles Tea Room and Jumping Jacks Soft Play closed. Since then Thomas Cook and William Hill have gone the same way, with a number of job losses at Tesco as well. That would be a heavy blow for a town double the size of Stranraer. Almost all of us will know someone affected – and many of us will also know of others who have lost their jobs recently, even if their plight didn’t make the headlines. The inconvenience we may have experienced of having holidays cancelled or having less places to take an energetic toddler pale into insignificance compared to the heartbreak of those who have lost their only source of income, while all their expenses stay the same.

Gone are the days when people started a job in their mid-teens and were there until they retired. In a world of increasing uncertainty, job security is something that fewer and fewer people can take for granted. In fact, even the original Thomas Cook himself saw his fledgling travel business collapse back in 1848, only to recover a few years later.

619x825.jpg

As well as the heartache, there has also been anger at how some of the job losses have come about, not least with the news that the former boss of Thomas Cook received a £750,000 bonus in 2017.

It all seems a far cry from the man who founded the company in the mid-1800s. According to one modern biography, Thomas Cook got a taste for travel as a village missionary. He would travel round villages preaching, distributing tracts and setting up Sunday schools. We’re told that his faith ‘gave him a strong desire to help the downtrodden’, and much of the company’s profits were given to relief of the poor and charitable work. Cook was also involved in the growing temperance movement, after becoming convinced that cheap alcohol exacerbated the ‘poverty, crime, strife and wretchedness’ of the people.

Cook’s approach brought him into conflict with his son John who ‘believed that business should be kept separate from religion and philanthropy’. However the different approaches of father and son complemented each other. John was certainly more concerned with the bottom line, leaving the company with 84 offices and 2692 staff (almost 1000 of them in Egypt). Yet both father and son were interested in world travel for reasons other than just profits. By organising the first tour party ever to go around the world, Cook hoped to ‘pioneer the way for the golden age when nations shall learn war no more’ (a reference to Isaiah 2:4). John likewise believed ‘that the world would be a pleasanter place of habitation if all the dwellers on its surface were brought closer together, and that international travel was one of the best preservatives against international wars’.

While their vision may seem idealistic, it was an attempt to view their work as part of the bigger picture. That’s certainly an important emphasis to try and retain today – both for employers and employees. As a pastor, part of my role includes counselling people who have recently lost their jobs, have been out of work long-term – or whose problems are more in the area of overwork. Since work forms such a big part of many of our lives, it’s no surprise that the Bible has plenty to say about it. And as with many things, we could sum up its teaching by saying that work is a good thing, but not a God thing. In other words, work isn’t the necessary evil that it’s often thought of – but neither should it have the number one place in our lives, where our families or our souls are sacrificed on the idol of our careers.

Whether we are currently employed or not, it’s important for us to remember that our work doesn’t define us. The Bible defines us all as people made in the image of God. The big danger of placing our identity in work or family or anything that can be taken away from you is that once it’s gone, our identity has been so tied up with it that we don’t know who we are anymore. Rather, we have a dignity and value that can’t be taken away from us, no matter what outward changes take place in our lives. If you have work, be thankful for it, but beware of defining yourself (or anyone else) by what you do.

Published in the Stranraer & Wigtownshire Free Press, 24th October 2019

Global Day of Prayer for RP Ministers

Synod_2019-144.jpg

The Reformed Presbyterian Churches of North America, Ireland, Scotland and Australia have agreed to appoint the Lord’s Day, 6th October 2019 as a day for united prayer in all our congregations that God would raise up men to serve as pastors and missionaries. This is a keenly felt need in each of our denominations and it is a wonderful expression of our unity in the Gospel that we can join with one another in a day of prayer that will span the globe.

The RP Global Alliance have produced prayer points which highlight the number of churches currently without pastors in each country, along with the number of men currently being trained for ministry in each place. These numbers include the Japanese Presbytery, which is currently under the oversight of the RPCNA. You can read the prayer points here or download a PDF version here. Prayer points are also available in French and Spanish.